

Three
things are painful for the body:
heart attack is painful,
intestinal pain is even more paintful,
but an empty pocket is the worst of all.
(Kohelet Rabbah 7)
|
The violence
and Christian fervor of the First Crusade (1096-99) unleashed a tide of hatred
and violence. Increasing restrictions on the Jews caused major changes in
their status and livelihood in northern and central Europe; they were gradually
driven out of trade by reduced profits and poor security caused by the inimical
attitude of society towards them. Jews were denied any share in the Christian
towns and craft guilds, which were quickly becoming the only framework for
trade and crafts. While the economy was expanding and needed a steady supply
of money (i.e., precious metals) to do so, there was little money available
in Christian Europe. Large quantities of precious metals had been withdrawn
from circulation and used by the nobility and church for regalia, jewelry
and church utensils. The limited monetary supply that remained in Christian
hands was invested in commercial "partnerships" that allowed to
the lender/investor to both profit from and circumvent the Church's prohibition
on interest-bearing loans.
At the same
time, Jews who had reduced their commercial activity did have money available
and were looking for new ways make a living. The difficult realities of the
period also encouraged Rabbis of the period to become more lenient as regards
the traditional ban on moneylending, permitting Jews to lend money on interest,
at least to Gentiles.[*] Thus money-lending
became the primary business of Jews in England and western Europe. At first
municipalities, noblemen and the church were the main borrowers, but the market
soon expanded to include other classes as well.
Some loans
were secured by document, without collateral, but most loans were given on
the double surety of a written deed and collateral. Although technically excluded
from commerce and trades, Jewish moneylenders frequently engaged in occupations
related to the repair and sale of the unredeemed collateral in their hands.
Since interest
rates were high (33% or more) repayment of loans was often difficult and the
needy debtor often came to hate the Jewish creditor (who had helped him out
of his own need). Feeding on this hate as well as religious enmity and social
isolation, many anti-Jewish persecutions had dual economic and religious motivations.
The instigators were as interested in destroying the records of their debts
as they were in eliminating the infidels in their midst. This was one of the
reasons that a central archive of debt deeds was established in 13th-century
England. These archives also served the authorities' desire to supervise Jewish
lending and maximize tax collections.
The Church's
prohibition against usury did not prevent Christian rulers from exploiting
Jews as their agents for usury and then extorting
most of the profit from them. Moratoria on debt owed to Jews, outright confiscation
and expulsion were also tools used to direct most of the profit from Jewish
money lending away from Jewish hands.
 |
[*]
Especially
important was Rabbi Jacob b. Meir Tam, (c. 1100 - 1171, France) who
summarized the reasons his leniency as followings: "Today people
usually lend money on interest to gentiles... because we have to pay
taxes to the king and princes and everything serves to sustain ourselves
[kedei hayyenu]. We live among the nations and it is impossible for
us to earn a living unless we deal with them. It is, therefore, no more
forbidden to lend at interest ... than it is to engage in any other
business." [back] |
 |
Encyclopedia
Judaica (Jerusalem: Keter Publishing).
Ben-Sasson, History of the Jewish People, Harvard University
Press |